I read two interesting articles this weekend, both pointing out that we are, indeed, winning in Iraq. Here is Jack Kelly of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette,
Al-Qaida has been driven from every neighborhood in Baghdad, Maj. Gen. Joseph Fil, the U.S. commander there, said Nov. 7. This follows the expulsion of al-Qaida from two previous “capitals” of its Islamic Republic of Iraq, Ramadi and Baquba.
Al-Qaida is evacuating populated areas and is trying to establish hideouts in the Hamrin mountains in northern Iraq, with U.S. and Iraqi security forces, and former insurgent allies who have turned on them, in hot pursuit. Forty-five al-Qaida leaders were killed or captured in October alone.
Al-Qaida’s support in the Muslim world has plummeted, partly because of the terror group’s lack of success in Iraq, more because al-Qaida’s attacks have mostly killed Muslim civilians.
And this from the Australian,
The dramatic improvement is directly attributed to the surge of 30,000 US troops, their effective counter-insurgency strategy and to the fact that locals are fed up with al-Qa’ida and other extremists. The good news is not just limited to Baghdad. Anbar, once an al-Qa’ida stronghold, is relatively peaceful thanks to the joint efforts of Sunni sheiks and marines. In the south, those willing Iraq to defeat were gloomily predicting that the withdrawal of British troops from Basra would lead to a brutal domination of the city by Iranian-backed terrorists. That hasn’t happened.
Despite the fact that the Democrats are invested in our defeat, the U.S. counterinsurgency strategy has made significant progress in Iraq. The only question remaining is whether this improved security situation will lead to a stable and prosperous Iraq. While the signs are getting better that this will come to pass, only time will tell. In the mean time, I am still waiting for The New York Times to write a front page story about the improving situation in Iraq.
UPDATE: My friends at The New York Times have a front page story about the progress in Iraq. (They must have read my blog.
)
Seriously, though, it is good to see that the Times has finally written something positive about the situation in Iraq. What is this, one positive story for every thousand negative stories?