<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: George Will explains high gas prices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theconservativerevolution.com/energy/george-will-explains-gas-prices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theconservativerevolution.com/energy/george-will-explains-gas-prices/</link>
	<description>The blog of Brendan Steinhauser, author of "The Conservative Revolution: How to Win the Battle for College Campuses"</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: cc1263</title>
		<link>http://theconservativerevolution.com/energy/george-will-explains-gas-prices/#comment-7064</link>
		<dc:creator>cc1263</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 01:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theconservativerevolution.com/?p=550#comment-7064</guid>
		<description>I think it is in our interest to subsidize renewable energy research and development if we hope to sustain something approaching the current American lifestyle.  

Oil is going to get more and more scarce, and thus more and more expensive.  If Americans can't afford to buy cheap goods from China because they are spending more and more income on gasoline the economy will teeter.  

It will be difficult to maintain the suburban lifestyle under this new economic order and quality of living will decrease as oil prices increase, eroding the middle class and crushing the poor.  

American infrastructure will not be able to adapt quickly enough to higher energy costs, as previously stated.  So the danger is not just that gas/transportation/freight costs will continue to rise, but that our infrastructure is not designed for $4 gas.  

We must find new alternative fuels and utilize a broad array of current methods in order to solve this problem.  Domestic production increases are not the permanent solution we need.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is in our interest to subsidize renewable energy research and development if we hope to sustain something approaching the current American lifestyle.  </p>
<p>Oil is going to get more and more scarce, and thus more and more expensive.  If Americans can&#8217;t afford to buy cheap goods from China because they are spending more and more income on gasoline the economy will teeter.  </p>
<p>It will be difficult to maintain the suburban lifestyle under this new economic order and quality of living will decrease as oil prices increase, eroding the middle class and crushing the poor.  </p>
<p>American infrastructure will not be able to adapt quickly enough to higher energy costs, as previously stated.  So the danger is not just that gas/transportation/freight costs will continue to rise, but that our infrastructure is not designed for $4 gas.  </p>
<p>We must find new alternative fuels and utilize a broad array of current methods in order to solve this problem.  Domestic production increases are not the permanent solution we need.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://theconservativerevolution.com/energy/george-will-explains-gas-prices/#comment-7063</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 18:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theconservativerevolution.com/?p=550#comment-7063</guid>
		<description>Even if we put billions of dollars into renewable energy, we wouldn't be able to meet our growing demand with renewables alone. We do need to increase the supply by drilling, building more refineries and building nuclear power plants. 

Private sector research and development of solar, wind and biofuels is fine, but government subsidies and mandates doesn't make any sense. For the last few decades the left has blocked efforts to increase our domestic supply. The political pressure is finally building to expand the supply.

www.gaspriceprotest.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if we put billions of dollars into renewable energy, we wouldn&#8217;t be able to meet our growing demand with renewables alone. We do need to increase the supply by drilling, building more refineries and building nuclear power plants. </p>
<p>Private sector research and development of solar, wind and biofuels is fine, but government subsidies and mandates doesn&#8217;t make any sense. For the last few decades the left has blocked efforts to increase our domestic supply. The political pressure is finally building to expand the supply.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gaspriceprotest.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.gaspriceprotest.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cc1263</title>
		<link>http://theconservativerevolution.com/energy/george-will-explains-gas-prices/#comment-7060</link>
		<dc:creator>cc1263</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 17:41:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theconservativerevolution.com/?p=550#comment-7060</guid>
		<description>Drilling for more oil domestically is a very shortsided solution to our energy needs.  We would blow through 10.4 billion barrels in no time and be back in the same situation.  We need to put serious dollars into R&#38;D for renewable energy, because the geographic infrastructure of America is based on the abundance of cheap oil.  To clarify, regardless of what the gasoline costs I still have no viable alternative way to travel to work and my internship.  Gas could cost $10 a gallon and I would still have no choice but to fill up.  I would rather have a pristine ANWR than drill for oil that will last 6 months and drop prices at the pump by 20 cents a gallon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drilling for more oil domestically is a very shortsided solution to our energy needs.  We would blow through 10.4 billion barrels in no time and be back in the same situation.  We need to put serious dollars into R&amp;D for renewable energy, because the geographic infrastructure of America is based on the abundance of cheap oil.  To clarify, regardless of what the gasoline costs I still have no viable alternative way to travel to work and my internship.  Gas could cost $10 a gallon and I would still have no choice but to fill up.  I would rather have a pristine ANWR than drill for oil that will last 6 months and drop prices at the pump by 20 cents a gallon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TexasFred</title>
		<link>http://theconservativerevolution.com/energy/george-will-explains-gas-prices/#comment-7002</link>
		<dc:creator>TexasFred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 23:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theconservativerevolution.com/?p=550#comment-7002</guid>
		<description>It really pisses me off, we have enough oil, right here in the USA and off of our coasts, to keep this nation well lubricated for the next 100 years at least, and if the brainiacs can't come up with an alternative to oil by then, THEY have a problem...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really pisses me off, we have enough oil, right here in the USA and off of our coasts, to keep this nation well lubricated for the next 100 years at least, and if the brainiacs can&#8217;t come up with an alternative to oil by then, THEY have a problem&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
