<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McCain and Obama Clash on the Economy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theconservativerevolution.com/john-mccain/mccain-and-obama-clash-on-the-economy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theconservativerevolution.com/john-mccain/mccain-and-obama-clash-on-the-economy/</link>
	<description>The blog of Brendan Steinhauser, author of "The Conservative Revolution: How to Win the Battle for College Campuses"</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: cc1263</title>
		<link>http://theconservativerevolution.com/john-mccain/mccain-and-obama-clash-on-the-economy/#comment-7140</link>
		<dc:creator>cc1263</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theconservativerevolution.com/?p=553#comment-7140</guid>
		<description>Lower taxes, less regulation and more economic growth ARE good for everyone, but they are especially good for the wealthy.  Nowhere in my comment did I make any suggestions for economic planning.  My point is to say that these measures serve certain segments of the economy better than others.  John Edwards is on to something with his two Americas idea.  I do believe the free market is the best approach, but even you must admit that $4 a gal gas hurts certain segments of society much harder than others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lower taxes, less regulation and more economic growth ARE good for everyone, but they are especially good for the wealthy.  Nowhere in my comment did I make any suggestions for economic planning.  My point is to say that these measures serve certain segments of the economy better than others.  John Edwards is on to something with his two Americas idea.  I do believe the free market is the best approach, but even you must admit that $4 a gal gas hurts certain segments of society much harder than others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brendan</title>
		<link>http://theconservativerevolution.com/john-mccain/mccain-and-obama-clash-on-the-economy/#comment-7120</link>
		<dc:creator>Brendan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theconservativerevolution.com/?p=553#comment-7120</guid>
		<description>I think you are wrong. And "trickle down" economics is a left-wing term that refers to supply side economics. Lower taxes, less regulations and more economic growth are better for all in a society.

Economic planning doesn't work. Just look at Peru vs. Chile, or North Korea vs. South Korea. Freedom works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you are wrong. And &#8220;trickle down&#8221; economics is a left-wing term that refers to supply side economics. Lower taxes, less regulations and more economic growth are better for all in a society.</p>
<p>Economic planning doesn&#8217;t work. Just look at Peru vs. Chile, or North Korea vs. South Korea. Freedom works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cc1263</title>
		<link>http://theconservativerevolution.com/john-mccain/mccain-and-obama-clash-on-the-economy/#comment-7075</link>
		<dc:creator>cc1263</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theconservativerevolution.com/?p=553#comment-7075</guid>
		<description>You do have a point about Obama and taxes, but McCain's plans sound like the same old trickle down economic theory that has served us so well in the last 28 years.  Maybe I am wrong and its simply impossible for the economy to serve all all the economic strata.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do have a point about Obama and taxes, but McCain&#8217;s plans sound like the same old trickle down economic theory that has served us so well in the last 28 years.  Maybe I am wrong and its simply impossible for the economy to serve all all the economic strata.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
